Watch Andy duck and weave!

From - Thu May 10 22:01:19 2001
From: "EE Support" 
Newsgroups: alt.security,alt.security.scramdisk,alt.privacy
References: <_5eI6.17914$wO6.2794059@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <9e20eed4a6a4999ec0076f022d309299@remailer.segfault.net> 
 

Subject: Re: Alleged Evidence-Eliminator boobytrap but no hard facts
Lines: 33
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
Message-ID: <08lI6.19701$Kt2.2149253@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 23:40:20 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.105.25.122
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com
X-Trace: news6-win.server.ntlworld.com 988929660 213.105.25.122 
(Thu, 03 May 2001 23:41:00 BST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 23:41:00 BST
Organization: ntlworld News Service
Xref: news3 alt.security:31904 alt.security.scramdisk:4394 alt.privacy:59551



"Syracuse"  wrote in message
news:Xns9096EDF97FF8Asyracuse@62.253.162.103...
> "EE Support"  wrote in
> :
>
> >That's what it says. But the question is who can prove it doesn't work.
>
> and the next question is who needs to - we are the consumers - you need
> to persuade us - you have this situation confused

The people who need to do the proving are the people who claim EE doesn't
work or who go snooping in your PC.

We say it defeats all known forensic analysis software.

It can defeat Encase, the same software used by the US Secret service and
the LAPD.

We at EE are open to proof to the contrary. And if you can prove EE doesn't
work, which the detrators on these newsgroups have tried for over a year to
do, we welcome you or anybody else to prove it does not work. At that time
we would improve it to beat the analyzer.

"Innocent until Proven Otherwise".

Cheers
EE Support

Very nice, Andy. But answer the question, won't you -- which testing lab did you use to verify that your program actually works against all known forensic methods? -- Eric