More EE arrogance

Can you act any more unprofessionally than this? Watch Andy duck! Watch Andy weave! Watch Andy totally evade the question!

From: "EE Support" 
Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.security.pgp,alt.security.scramdisk,
         alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject:  (more detractory accusations but still EE works great)
         proof that EE does work!!!!
Lines: 260
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000
Message-ID: 
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 23:07:32 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.105.4.216
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 23:07:46 BST
Organization: ntlworld News Service

> "EE Support"  wrote:
> >"P.Dulles" <*@*.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.155df8d221a8f66798983b@news.alt.net...
> You claim that your product also renders hardware recovery methods
useless; ie:
> magnetic force microscopy (MFM), magnetic force scanning tunneling
microscopy
> (STM), and/or any other combarable hardware data recovery methods in use
today.
>
>
> *********************************************************************
>
> features.shtml
>
> Key Features of Evidence Eliminator?
>
> Evidence Eliminator? destroys in one click:
>
> ...
>
> Free cluster space ("Slack") from all file tips
> Magnetic remenance from underneath existing files/folders
>
> ...
>
>
> whatsnew.shtml
>
> Anti-Magnetic Remenance Under-Writing
>   - Another World First! Cleans underneath files/dirs.
>   - Defeats hardware analysis by electron microscopes.
>   - Defends against forensic laboratory snoops.
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> If this is the case, I assume this has been tested and verified by a
> reputable,
> unbiased, up-to-date and experienced data recovery firm that has this
> capability?
>
> If so: which firm(s) conducted the testing?
> Can you or the recovery firm supply reliable, verifiable documention of
before
> and after data recovery results?
>
> Until then at least one of your claims is unsubstantiated lip service.
> And if that is the case, why should any user of your product have faith
> in or believe any claims made by you or your staff?
>

Facts, Proof & Evidence please to support your claims?

There are none?

There are claims here of unanswered emails (which as far as we know do not
exist)

etc etc

by an "anonymous journalist" who requires Evidence Eliminator to prove that
it's evidence has not been eliminated.

But the real test of Evidence Eliminator is who can *prove* that it does not
work?

That's telling him, Andy! You told'em "fuck off and die" real good! But how about answering his question? Oh, I forget, you'd rather duck and weave and evade any serious discussion. Man, you're a real confidence builder, Andy.